CHEMICAL TESTS
CHEMICAL TESTS OF BLOOD, BREATH, OR URINE
Q. Should I submit to a chemical test? What
will happen if I don't? Which test should I choose?
A. In most states, if someone is arrested for
DUI, DWI, OUI, OWI, drunk driving, or a related charge,
they are required to provide a sample of their blood or
breath for testing for alcohol content. (Where someone
is suspected of driving under the influence of drugs, they
must give a sample of their blood or urine.) The DMV
typically advises people that as a condition of getting
their driver's license, they have consented to a chemical
test if they are suspected of DUI. This is called the
"implied consent" law, and most states have some version
of it.
If someone accused of drunk driving or DUI refuses to
take a chemical test, there are several possible
consequences: First, this refusal may be charged as a
separate crime; next, the refusal can be used to suspend
or revoke the person's driving privileges in a separate
DMV action; finally, the fact of the refusal can be
offered against the person at trial to show "consciousness
of guilt."
If someone arrested for DUI or DWI has refused the
test, it does prevent the prosecution from introducing
evidence of blood alcohol level. However, the collateral
consequences are potentially severe. Unfortunately, in
most states, a person arrested for driving under the
influence does not have the right to consult with an
attorney before deciding whether to give a sample of their
blood or breath, or deciding what type of sample to give.
There is no simple answer about which type of test to
take. Breath test machines do not retain a portion of the
breath to be independently retested. However, there are
many ways to impeach the accuracy of the machines. Many
people are not suitable candidates for breath testing,
even if the machines are working properly. This can be the
result of dental problems or persistent heartburn
problems, both of which invite mouth-alcohol error by the
machines.
Blood testing is generally thought to be the most
accurate type of testing, but it too is subject to many
challenges and problems. Contamination from an alcohol
swab, used to sterilize the area of the blood draw, can
compromise the blood sample. Failure to properly mix the
preservative and anti-coagulant in the blood sample can
cause the sample to ferment, and literally create its own
alcohol. Also, there is only one blood sample drawn (as
compared with the usual two breath samples), so if
there is a problem with that one sample, there are
significant problems with the prosecution's case.
Urine samples, because of the wide array of problems
and challenges, are generally thought of as the least
reliable of the three types of chemical tests available.
However, they are, in most states, only given as an option
where a person is arrested of driving under the influence
of drugs, not driving under the influence of alcohol.
The consequences of a drunk driving conviction are
serious and far-reaching. Let one of the DUI LAWS
Attorneys give you a
free consultation.
CHOICE OF TESTS
Q. After a DUI arrest, I wanted to give a
blood test, but the officer talked me into the breath
test; can I do anything about that now?
A. A common problem in DUI or DWI cases is where
an officer fails to tell someone about their rights to
have a choice of chemical tests. A DUI or DWI suspect does
have the option of giving a sample of their blood or
breath. If more than drunk driving is suspected, namely
driving under the influence of drugs, then the DUI or DWI
suspect may choose a urine test. If the officer fails to
give a drunk driving suspect their choice of tests, and
insists on one particular test, that test result can be
suppressed.
If an officer fails to tell a DUI suspect about the
consequences of refusing the chemical test, and the person
does refuse, the fact of that refusal may not be allowed
into evidence. Usually, where someone arrested for DUI or
DWI refuses to take a blood or breath test, that refusal
can be introduced against them as consciousness of guilt.
The prosecution's theory is that only a guilty person
would refuse to take the test. However, if someone is
charged with drunk driving, and they aren't properly told
of the consequences of refusal, namely that their driver's
license will be suspended or revoked, the refusal may not
be used against them.
One of the DUI LAWS Member Attorneys is
available to help right now. Click
here to find one near you.
Learn about alcohol breath testing - "Physiological
Laws Of Alcohol Breath Testing"
ONE DUI, TWO CHARGES
Q. I was arrested for DUI, but I'm charged
with violating two different laws; why is this?
A. In most states, where someone is arrested for
DUI (driving under the influence) or DWI
(driving while intoxicated or driving while impaired),
they are accused of failing to operate their car in the
same careful manner as a sober person would in those same
circumstances.
However, most states, due to pressure from the federal
government relating to highway funds, have also enacted
"per se" laws. Those laws establish a legal limit, usually
.08%. If someone is caught with .08% or higher, as
established by a test of their blood, breath, or urine,
they can be charged with DUI or DWI. Even if the person
doesn't exhibit any of the typical signs of drunk driving,
and is able to drive just fine, they are charged with DUI
or DWI based only on their body chemistry.
The prosecutor will usually charge both crimes: the
traditional DUI or DWI, where they accuse someone of being
unable to drive with the same caution as a sober person,
and the "per se" violation of being above the legal limit.
A conviction on one charge is the same as a conviction on
the other. They are two ways of charging the same crime.
It just gives the prosecutor two bites at the same apple.
If someone is convicted of both drunk driving and being
above the legal limit, they are only punished once.
Take note - if you've been arrested for DUI, DWI, or a
drunk driving related charge, there are time limits to
take action. Contact a DUI LAWS lawyer near you for
a
free consultation.
|